Aazealh said:
Like I said, I don't think it would bring much to the table.
Well, I personally disagree and I explained what value I think it could bring. You certainly don't have agree on its value, that's perfectly fine.
Aazealh said:
I honestly don't see how that would make things more interesting compared to being told about it or having only partial memories/flashes of it. Those create many more opportunities for the characters to talk to each other and for new, different relationships to be born.
As I said already, I think Casca will still need to be told and informed of things regardless of of whether her nonlucid experiences are remembered or not (as I don't think they would be remembered in a normal manner, she would likely need to put in work to process and understand them sufficiently). And as I explained, I think the emotional mindset that Casca would/could have if she retained her memories can create just as many opportunities for characters to interact with each other and modify/build new relationships, only just in a different manner than your scenario would have.
Aazealh said:
"Various wrongs" meaning two occurrences, including one for which Guts wasn't responsible because he became possessed by shielding her from spectres.
I am not sure if I am misunderstanding you, but Guts was only possessed by spectres when he physically assaulted Casca, he wasn't possessed by spectres when he sexually assaulted Casca (now one could argue he was "possessed" by The Beast of Darkness, but even then the beast is something that originates from Guts).
Aazealh said:
Like I told you in the other thread where you mentioned this, I don't think that single occurrence in volume 23 where Guts loses it and assaults her holds so strong a significance that the entire process of curing her should hinge upon it. It's one element out of the general situation between them, and its importance relative to everything else is not as big as you're making it out to be. It has to be opposed to everything else he did for her (which is quite a lot), but also should be put next to his abandonment of her for two years and his mistreatment of their son in the early years. In the end I believe the whole picture will matter more than the individual details, especially since a restored Casca should presumably be more likely to forgive his lapse in judgment if she knows everything.
Keep in mind that this single event has had very long-lasting repercussions already, by canceling whatever goodwill Guts had earned in rescuing her and returning him to the status quo of Casca's inherent fear of males since the Eclipse. But it was dependent on Casca not being able to see the bigger picture, as was last highlighted by Farnese in episode 331. Once she can finally see it, to stay stuck on this specific event over everything else would feel like a lack of character development.
I don't think the incident in Volume 23 should hold so much significance that the entire process of curing her should hinge upon it. And I agree it should be put next to his abandonment of her for two years and his mistreatment of their son in the early years (I wouldn't want Casca to not remember those issues/incidents either). And I agree Guts' wrongs should contrasted/weighed with all the good things he has done as well, but that doesn't mean that they should just cancel each other out. I just think Casca remembering the wrongs
and the rights Guts did for/against her would be more interesting than her having to rely/react only on what is told to her.
Aazealh said:
Sounds to me like you don't actually have much faith in Miura here.
Jeez, that's kind of presumptuous of you. I can have faith in Miura's storytelling ability without it being a blind faith. Having anxiety/being prepared to critique a writer's future potential narrative choices doesn't invalidate the faith one can simultaneously hold at the same time.