I went through a little thought exercise this afternoon that I wanted to share. It doesn't necessarily shed any new light on anything, but all the same, I wanted to write it out.
When you're merely a reader of Berserk, the sequence of events seems obvious in retrospect. Cause and effect: This happened, so that happened. But if you are Kentarou Miura, working on the pages in the moment, you have infinite options to consider. So I think it's interesting to consider Miura's reasoning when he made certain choices. In this case, I was wondering about his choice after Albion to break up the group, only to reunify them 15 episodes later.
During the events of Albion (Vols 18-21) Miura brought Guts' future group together: Farnese, Serpico, Isidro, and to a lesser extent, Azan. But after the climax, they each headed off on their own for a bit; Isidro and Farnese/Serpico chased after Guts (not necessarily together). And Azan left to report the events to the Holy See (poor guy...).
Miura obviously knew they'd all end up together again. So why break them up, only to bring them back together shortly afterward? If they had continued on as a group directly from Albion, it would have been more expedient. And a lesser writer probably would have chose that path for that reason. But Miura knew better.
First, I think it was important for the Hill of Swords scene to function as well as it does that the remaining Falcons were reunited without any distractions or necessary exposition to newer party members. Miura wanted the focus to be on Guts/Casca/Griffith for that moment—not any others. Keeping it focused on them also obscures the implications of that event, and that triad's dynamic, from the others, which adds to the enigma of Guts and Griffith for them.
Second, I think Miura wanted to isolate Guts and exacerbate the reasons he needed companions if he wanted to bring Casca to safety. Because Guts' traveling problems culminated when the specter overtook him and he attacked Casca, leading to the scene of the Beast biting Casca's breast. Could it have functioned if others were around? Maybe... But it would have completely changed the impact of it (scattering it), and it also led to a clear and present reason for Guts to accept companions.
Anyway, as you can see, I pulled a single thread on Miura's reasoning, and ended up completely understanding why he set things up the way he did.
When you're merely a reader of Berserk, the sequence of events seems obvious in retrospect. Cause and effect: This happened, so that happened. But if you are Kentarou Miura, working on the pages in the moment, you have infinite options to consider. So I think it's interesting to consider Miura's reasoning when he made certain choices. In this case, I was wondering about his choice after Albion to break up the group, only to reunify them 15 episodes later.
During the events of Albion (Vols 18-21) Miura brought Guts' future group together: Farnese, Serpico, Isidro, and to a lesser extent, Azan. But after the climax, they each headed off on their own for a bit; Isidro and Farnese/Serpico chased after Guts (not necessarily together). And Azan left to report the events to the Holy See (poor guy...).
Miura obviously knew they'd all end up together again. So why break them up, only to bring them back together shortly afterward? If they had continued on as a group directly from Albion, it would have been more expedient. And a lesser writer probably would have chose that path for that reason. But Miura knew better.
First, I think it was important for the Hill of Swords scene to function as well as it does that the remaining Falcons were reunited without any distractions or necessary exposition to newer party members. Miura wanted the focus to be on Guts/Casca/Griffith for that moment—not any others. Keeping it focused on them also obscures the implications of that event, and that triad's dynamic, from the others, which adds to the enigma of Guts and Griffith for them.
Second, I think Miura wanted to isolate Guts and exacerbate the reasons he needed companions if he wanted to bring Casca to safety. Because Guts' traveling problems culminated when the specter overtook him and he attacked Casca, leading to the scene of the Beast biting Casca's breast. Could it have functioned if others were around? Maybe... But it would have completely changed the impact of it (scattering it), and it also led to a clear and present reason for Guts to accept companions.
Anyway, as you can see, I pulled a single thread on Miura's reasoning, and ended up completely understanding why he set things up the way he did.

Nah, I'm pretty sure Puck was saying they needed to scram. Remember, they had previously been surrounded, so Azan and the others used the apperance of Zodd and Griffith to make a break for it.